Friday, 7 June 2019

Jefferson vs. Jackson


            In American history, President Jefferson viewed democracy differently from Jackson. They differed in many areas with regards to democracy. For instance, according to Jefferson, an individual should be in a position to establish an initiative since it was a test of character with reference to property requirements. On the other hand, Jackson saw no essence in the Jefferson concept of property requirement and erased it. According to Jefferson, government positions were only fit for the elite in society. However, he went ahead and proposed education for all so as to give ‘poorer’ people a future chance of assuming public offices. Jackson had a different idea; all government positions should be rotated and that anyone was qualified to hold a public office. Jefferson developed a system where only political leaders chose candidates. Jackson, on the other hand, introduced nominations through conventions (Baumer & Gold, 56).
Jefferson had some form of discrimination which he branded as democracy; he only recognized the yeoman farmer. Jackson included more groups in the chosen class such as mechanics, laborers, planters,and farmers. In terms of industrialization, Jefferson had his fears and did not embrace it, while Jackson saw that the growth of the American economy depended on industrialization. Jefferson granted monopolies rights to operate freely. He also used favorite state legislatures to provide corporate charters. Jackson did not leave out anyone who decided to start a business. Through the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he gave corporate charters to whoever dared to establish a company. The idea of the Bank of United States was somehow disapproved by Jefferson especially the interpretation of the elastic clause. Jackson, however, viewed the bank as a monopoly for the affluent. Jefferson believed that time would do away with slavery despite owning some himself. Jackson owned slaves but didn’t show interest in doing away with the matter. During Jefferson’s time, Indian and women were regarded as non-equals. Jackson shows an element of hatred towards the American Indians (Baumer & Gold, 56).
According to Jefferson, education was the correct tool used to prepare people to participate in democracy and to hold public office. On the contrary, Jack had little belief in the power of education and saw it as unimportant. Jefferson did not have the capacity to establish a public education system despite his belief that the major keys to success were ambition and education. Jackson was able to give individuals the opportunity to raise their economic and social standards by providing social charters. His policy thrived after he ended the Bank of the United States and gained control. He also believed that others could prosper through economic progress and the newly established social mobility (Richard, 289).
The changes that occurred during the times of Jackson were due to movements for democracy that were championed in the 1830s. The movement was spearheaded by Jackson himself; he wanted to do away with practices that promoted aristocracy in the United States of America (Belohlavek, 77). Jackson was fully opposed to the discrimination and rights that were only reserved for special groups of people in the nation. He pointed out that the main drive of the movement came from the new settlements in the West and South as well as the desire to achieve equality within the society. As indicated in the paper, the changes were significant because they would give everyone equal chances of raising economic and social standards.
Works Cited
Baumer, Donald C., and Howard J. Gold. Parties, polarization and Democracy in the United States. Routledge, 2015.
Belohlavek, John M. Andrew Jackson: Principle and Prejudice. Routledge, 2016.
Richard, Carl J. "The Classics and American Political Rhetoric in a Democratic and Romantic Age." Call of Classical Literature in the Romantic Age (2018): 289.