1.
On which elements will you compare these two articles? (Style, tone, evidence,
audience, etc…)
1. The way Jessica Scott-Reid and Marta Zaraska have presented their
opinions on anti-meat Subway ads is quite interesting. I will compare the two
articles based on their style and tone.
2. The target audience of the two writers is the people who remain confused
about whether to use meat or not
2.
Briefly summarize the main messages of the two articles as your topic
development section.
In her article, Jessica Scott-Reid mentions
that most of the brands selling meat products encourage their customers to buy
pigs, lobsters, cows, crabs, and goats every day. However, from an ethical and
moral point of view, these animals should be valued, and human beings should
stop using them as a meal. Jessica supports the idea that anti-meat Subway ads
should be displayed on social media and television to create awareness among
people regarding the seriousness of the issue. On the other hand, Marta Zaraska
states that anti-meat Subway ads look controversial and ineffective, as they
activate something that scientists name as the meat paradox. The writer thinks
that these kinds of advertisements are not good and that they should be banned
on a permanent basis.
3.
Write your thesis statement, incorporating all the necessary elements.
Anti-meat Subway ads are not good, as meat
provides the human body with loads of proteins and energy in the form of ATP,
and living without it for a lifetime may not be possible for any individual.
However, the one thing people can do is to decrease their dependence on meat
products or use both vegetarian and non-vegetarian foods in equal amounts.
